If India's manufacturing sector grew at 8% compounded for the next 30 years and China's stayed the same, India's still would not be as big. That alone reflects the scale of the challenge India faces. India's economic rise leads to honest questions about how it fell behind China in the first place. It's strange relationship with the Soviet Union, colonial legacy, manufacturing challenges and past policies have all played a role. India's demographic dividend is more time sensitive than most people think. Yes, it has advantages but the window and manner to capitalise upon them is not permanent or straight forward. #india #economy #indiaeconomy #china ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ Enjoyed the video? Subscribe here: Subscribe to my newsletter! Follow AltSimplified on Social media: Facebook: Twitter: |
In a memo obtained by the NY Post, Trump...
FOX Business’ Jeff Flock reports on the ...
Investor's Business Daily Executive Edit...
Rep. Mike Lawler, R-N.Y., on the upcomin...
There is no simplistic split of sentimen...
The Heritage Foundation's EJ Antoni expl...
Americans for Tax Reform president Grove...
Michelle Caruso Cabrera, CNBC Contributo...
Dan Leonard, senior meteorologist with T...
Oliver Chen, TD Cowen, joins 'Fast Money...
The 'Fast Money' traders look back at th...
Big Tech has dominated investor portfoli...
In some places, votes resulted in politi...
The city was meant to be China’s answer ...
If India's manufacturing sector grew at ...
Vietnam was one of the biggest winners f...
In some places, votes resulted in politi...
The city was meant to be China’s answer ...
Vietnam was one of the biggest winners f...
If India's manufacturing sector grew at ...